manutenzionegolf@gmail.com

Google Website Translator Gadget

mercoledì 21 marzo 2012

GILBERT HANSE E' L'ARCHITETTO CHE FIRMERÀ IL PROGETTO DEL PERCORSO DI RIO 2016

La commissione di Rio 2016 ha deciso di affidare a G. Hanse il progetto del percorso che ospiterà' il Golf ai Giochi Olimpici brasiliani.
L'Architetto americano ha battuto sette finalisti: Gary Player Design, Greg Norman Golf Course Design,Hawtree Ltd., Nicklaus Design, Renaissance Golf Design, Robert Trent Jones II and Thomson Perrett.
Il golf ritornerà' sport olimpico dopo 112 anni.
Il percorso verrà' realizzato a Reserva Marapendi in Barra de Tijuca, a 5 Km dal villaggio olimpico, dopo le Olimpiadi il percorso diverrà' pubblico per promuovere il Golf in Brasile.


martedì 6 marzo 2012

SE VOLESTE MISURARE IL SUCCESSO DELLA VOSTRA MANUTENZIONE DEL PERCORSO DA GOLF QUALE INDICE UTILIZZERESTE?

Methodology: A post was made on LinkedIn Groups - GCSAA, Golf Superintendent, Golf Course Superintendents / Turf Professionals, Golf Course Superintendents, Assistants & Interns; also on Facebook Group; Golf Course Maintenance and the blog, Golf Course Business. At these sites a copy of the question or a link was posted to the poll. These posting links and polls where left online for 10 days and active for 10 days.

The question was: If you were ask to measure the success of the golf maintenance business you manage, what one metric would you use? 

The selections were: 
  • Budgetary
  • Conditioning
  • Player satisfaction
  • Increase in rounds played
Of 132 respondents that weighed-in, no confirmation was made as to the respondents livelihood as a golf course superintendent.

I asked the question to investigate what was considered the mission as viewed by the golf course superintendent to his/her golf course maintenance endeavor. This poll is unscientific but it revealed that the metric that best described success in the business of golf maintenance is Player satisfaction.
 
Golf course conditioning garnered 21% and is the top response from golfers perennially from the National Golf Foundation.

An Increase in Rounds played could be construed as perhaps a function of discounted pricing but I like to think if an increase was had it was due to better overall management - cost controls as well as proper pricing.

And lastly success as a Budgetary category, the ability to properly manage a golf course to a budget came in last, at 11%.

In McMahon Group's survey database the golf course has always scored highest in satisfactionconsidering all club amenities, services and features. Most important, the golf facility was always listed as the most important feature at clubs that offer golf.

We can easily take away that the management of golf course maintenance as viewed by golf course managers, superintendents and others in the same business is driven by Player satisfaction andConditioning, more so than financially driven by increasing rounds or achieving a budgetary goal. Golf course superintendents should also be keenly aware of the facts that sound business management will also be an integral part of the important metrics equation when judging success in golf course management.

Important to the above equation is also a Value – Price – Quality comparison. Golf has a dramatic range of product, from a mom & pop nine hole to a deluxe high end, oceanfront, private clubs. Consider these variables when making decisions on appropriate golf course maintenance techniques.

Being a golf course superintendent you must consider the above dilemma. Golf course superintendents are constantly being asked to achieve two seemingly conflicting goals: assure the highest quality of the course while keeping costs low. While it may seem futile to try to resolve these two conflicting issues, a structured approach towards cost and quality can help, player satisfaction and conditioning are still the most important drivers to success. 

Efforts to quantify these elements are always going to cause ulcers. Great superintendents make their best effort to supply the best conditions that will yield player satisfaction and good conditioning along with a cost that can be tolerated by the business. Once this balance is achieved the market will generally reward the facility with increased business, whether it is memberships or daily play.

The lines are generally blurred when it comes to successful management and key metrics involved. All of the choices are indeed interrelated, if one area is left without attention the rest of the categories won’t matter. Players must be satisfied for them to return, a budget must be closely met or the business will not have appropriate funds to operate, conditioning of the course speaks to satisfaction levels and in increase in usage will generally bring in more dollars.

COME ANNUNCIATO PROTOCOLLO INTESA FEDERGOLF/ASSOCIAZIONI AMBIENTALISTE

protocollo d'intesafig

lunedì 5 marzo 2012

CORSO TECNICO PROFESSIONALE TAPPETI ERBOSI LA FERTILIZZAZIONE 31 GENNAIO 2012

FERTILIZZANTI TAPPETO ERBOSO

CORSO TECNICO PROFESSIONALE TAPPETI ERBOSI 9 FEBBRAIO 2012

SUBSTRATI TAPPETO ERBOSO

mercoledì 8 febbraio 2012

LA FEDERGOLF SIGLA ACCORDO CON AMBIENTALISTI

(ANSA)-ROMA,8 FEB -''E' un accordo storico giunto dopo tanti anni di lavoro.Se un tempo il golf era quasi all'indice delle associazioni ambientaliste, oggi invece si firma un protocollo che testimonia che siamo andati avanti lungo la strada del rispetto dell'ambiente''.Il presidente della Federgolf,Franco Chimenti,saluta cosi' il protocollo d'intesa siglato a Roma dalla sua Federazione e dalle associazioni ambientaliste Legambiente, Wwf, Fai e Federparchi.''Perseguiremo tutte le iniziative non in linea col protocollo''.

venerdì 6 gennaio 2012

IN CANADA VOGLIONO CHE I GREEN FEES SIANO COSTI DETRAIBILI DALLE TASSE (articolo dal Wall Street Journal)


OTTAWA—A group of Canadian lawmakers is teeing off at what the country's golfers say is a decades-old unfair rule in the country's tax law.
Since 1971, Canadians have been barred from deducting greens fees for business-related golf outings. Canadian companies and businessmen can deduct hockey and other professional sports events, theater and concert tickets, and pricey meals at the country's finest restaurants, so long as they are business-related. But deducting a host of golf-related expenses—a staple of the tax code south of the border in the U.S.—is out of bounds.
ASSOCIATED PRESS
President Bill Clinton riding on a golf cart with Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chretien during a round of golf at the Ashburn Golf Club in Halifax, Nova Scotia, after a G7 Summit in 1995.
A caucus of about two dozen parliamentarians from across all political stripes is pushing to persuade Canadian Finance Minister Jim Flaherty, himself an occasional golfer, to throw out the old law—introduced in an era when policy makers still viewed golf as an elitist pursuit. Today, golf is the country's most popular recreational activity, beating out even the national pastime of hockey, according to the country's statistics agency.
"It seems to me times have changed, and there's a chance to revisit this," said Russ Hiebert, a member of the ruling Conservative party. He represents an area south of Vancouver that is home to eight golf courses and a driving range.
Peter Stoffer, a member of the left-leaning opposition New Democratic Party, agrees. He says golf is environmentally friendly; it's a game that's often used to help raise cash for charity; and it promotes a healthy lifestyle among Canada's youth. His district, near Halifax, is home to seven golf courses.
Behind the legislative assault is an industry that has long targeted the law. The last attempt to revoke the measure fizzled in 2008, when the global financial crisis threatened to sap Canada's finances. The effort to repeal the law seemed a low priority at the time.
Canada's economy has recovered better than most other industrial countries. While Prime Minister Stephen Harper has promised to slash expenses to balance the budget, he has also pushed through a number of big corporate tax cuts and a series of smaller tax-relief measures.
Those include breaks for parents whose kids enroll in sports and bigger tax deductions for long-haul truck drivers. The golf industry thinks the timing is right to be rid of the 1971 measure.
"As an industry, we are getting stepped on unfairly here," says Jeff Calderwood, chief executive of the National Golf Course Owners Association Canada. "No one else would tolerate it, so why should we." Mr. Calderwood said his association isn't contributing to any politicians' campaigns, and Canada's strict campaign-financing laws prohibit companies and unions from making political donations.
"I know people may see an ulterior motive but the reality is we just really like the game of golf, and we think the sport should be treated fairly as per other industries out there," says Mr. Stoffer, the NDP legislator.
Mr. Stoffer said the golf caucus sent a letter in mid-November to Mr. Flaherty, asking that the government reconsider golf's treatment under Canadian tax law. The hope is that changes would be forthcoming in the federal 2012 budget, due to be tabled some time in early 2012.
A spokesman for Canada's finance department, which is responsible for writing the tax laws, said golf is excluded because the "business" component tied to a round of golf "may often not be significant." Through a spokeswoman, Mr. Flaherty declined to comment, or confirm receipt of a letter from the Parliamentary golf caucus.
The cost of reversing the policy "wouldn't be insignificant," said Leonard Farber, a former senior policy maker in Canada's finance department and now an adviser at global law firm Norton Rose. Canadian government officials said it would be difficult to offer an estimate of lost revenue because deductions for golf have been excluded for the past 40 years.
Golf's special treatment under Canada's tax code has its genesis in the 1960s, when the game was targeted by a special government commission looking at whether wealthy Canadians were exploiting tax loopholes.
Geoffrey Hale, a tax-history expert and political science professor at Alberta's University of Lethbridge, said policy makers were swept up in the "egalitarian sense of the moment" when tax breaks for golf were nixed. Envy, though, was also a factor, he said.
"It was partly a function of civil servants saying, '[Business executives] can do this for recreational purposes, but we can't, and therefore why should we give you a tax break if we are writing the tax laws," he said.
Since then, policy makers have relented a bit. In 1997, tax officials ruled meals and beverages consumed in the clubhouse were eligible for a 50% deduction—the same deduction available for most other forms of business entertainment, such as restaurants and bars not located on a golf course.
Truck salesman Duncan Gillis is one of many business duffers hoping Parliament will go further. Nova Scotia-based Mr. Gillis has battled Canada's tax authorities over the years about his greens fees and says a golf game is crucial for winning and keeping customers. "With a round of golf, you have them for the whole day—which is a lot better than a 20-minute or half-hour sales call," Mr. Gillis said. "You get to know a lot about the customer, and he's is learning a lot more about you."

manutenzionegolf@gmail.com

Latest issue of GCM